Gut and head

I shoot photographs from the gut – the head then plays the constitutive role in the second step of collecting, organizing, grouping and categorizing the collected views of the world.

I pursue an open production aesthetic in my artistic design practice: I am not interested in a planned stylization of myself and my work as a corporate identity strategy of the contemporary artist, be it in formal or thematic specializations – even at the risk of appearing inconsistent, amateurish and unfocused. “Style” interests me as a phenomenon of pigeonholing – not as a pigeonhole itself, within which art should be consistently produced according to the “rules” of art. I try to change the “drawers” as often as possible – it is a methodical game of drawers.

Conceptual work does not exclude this approach within the overall work: but it only comes in a second step, when ideas arise from pictures that have already been shot. Through this “headless photography”, mistakes are provoked from the outset in a deliberately open manner. In general, I also consider mistakes to be the most interesting sources of artistic creation.

This artistic (dis)method is continued in my obsession with collecting: this is the second – usually more labor-intensive – part of my artistic work: placing the collected photographs in different drawers, inventing drawers, taking the groups of pictures apart again and reuniting them in a new and different way.

As a photographer, I am more of a collector than a hunter. I am interested in both the passionate “decisive moment” and the banal “documentation of visible life” as well as staged photography – but these differentiating elements of photographic perception interest me as a pictorial investigation of pigeonholing phenomena (image classification systems within contextualization norms), not as pigeonholes themselves.

Decisions regarding the selection of images – formal-aesthetic characteristics of the images with regard to an intended categorization – I make again with my gut, not with my head, as in photography. Photographs can thus be found and rediscovered by me in retrospect.

“(…) even as we live, we invent stories that express our pattern of experience, that make our experience legible. I believe, and this is decisive for the possibility of representation: experience is an idea, not a result of incidents. The incident, one and the same, serves a hundred different experiences. (…) Only experience changes everything, because it is not a result of history, but an idea that must change history in order to express it.”

 

Max Frisch (Interview excerpt from: Horst Bienek, Workshop Talks with Writers, 1962)